|
Indo-European studies occurs as field of linguistics, dealing using a Indo-European languages. Its goal is to uncover tools just about a suppositional proto-language from which all one languages come descended, the language of the early Bronze Age dubbed Proto-Indo-European (PIE), and its speakers, a Proto-Indo-Europeans.
Comparative Linguistics
A being of the Proto-Indo-Europeans has been inferred by comparative linguistics. A discovery of the transmitted relationship of the various Indo-European languages goes back to William Jones, a British judge within India, who within 1782 observed, that,
Ab initio, a related languages were just equated, by owning there are no attempt at reconstruction. August Schleicher was the number one scholar to compose the tentative text in the out commons source Jones got predicted. A reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) represents, by definition, a most common language of the Proto-Indo-Europeans. In the 20th century, great progress was processed due to the discovery of supplementary language lesson belonging to the Indo-European personal, & by advances inside comparative linguistics, by scholars like Ferdinand de Saussure. Strictly linguistic a food & drug administration was assisted by tries to reconstruct the culture and religion of the Proto-Indo-Europeans by scholars like Georges Dumézil, when well as by archeology (e. g. Marija Gimbutas, Colin Renfrew) and genetic science (e. g. Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza).
History of the Field
A formative phase of the field can be considered to lead off in the 18th century, by having Jones' 1782 discovery, & a first search into a grammar & linguistics of single non-classical languages. This early phase culminates around Franz Bopp's comparative grammar of 1833. A authoritative phase of Indo-European comparative linguistics leads from either Bopp to August Schleicher's 1861 compendium and as much as Karl Brugmann's Grundriss published from a 1880s. Brugmann's junggrammatische re-evalutation of the field, and Ferdinand de Saussure's development of the laryngeal theory may be considered the beginning of "contemporary" Indo-European studies. A Indo-European proto-language every bit described in the early 1900s in its main aspects is however accepted in todays world, & a function neutralize a 20th century hwhen been washing cost higher & rationalisation, too as a incorporation of freshly language poop, notably the Anatolian and Tocharian branches unknown in the 19th century, into the Indo-European framework.
Notably, a laryngeal theory, in its early forms discussed since a Eighties, became mainstream fallowing a 1927 discovery by Jerzy Kuryłowicz of the survival of at least some one hypothetic phomenes within Anatolian. Julius Pokorny in 1959 published his Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, giving an overview of a lexical cognition accumulated until the early 20th century, however neglecting so-recent trends of morphology & phonemics, & largely ignoring Anatolian & Tocharian.
A generation of Indo-Europeanists active in the go third of the 20th century, like Calvert Watkins, Jochem Schindler, Helmut Rix, developed a better understanding of morphology &, in the wake up of Kuryłowicz's 1956 Apophonie, ablaut. A Lexicon of the Indo-European verb edited by Rix appeared around 1997 as the foremost step towards a modernization of Pokorny's lexicon; a corresponding tome addressing the noun is inside preparation [http://www.indogermanistik.uni-freiburg.de/projekt.html]. Todays efforts come revolve about a better understanding of the proportional chronology inside the proto-language, aiming at distinctions of "early", "middle" & "late", or even "inner" & "outer" PIE idiom, however the general consensus has however to form. From either a Sixties, cognition of Anatolian began to become of a certainty sufficient to allow it influence the image of the proto-language, look at likewise Indo-Hittite.
Such tries at recovering a feel of historical depth inside PIE use at times been coupled by owning efforts towards coupling a history of the language by using archeology, notably by using the Kurgan hypothesis. J. P. Mallory's 1997 Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture gives an overview of this. These speculations all about a realia of Proto-Indo-European culture come even so non section of the field of comparative linguistics, however like the sister-discipline.
List of Indo-Europeanists
historical, understand beneath for coeval IE studies
Jakob Grimm (1785-1863)
Rasmus Rask (1787-1832)
Franz Bopp (1791-1867)
August Friedrich Pott (1802-1887)
Theodor Benfey (1809-1881)
Rudolf von Raumer (1815-1876)
Otto von Böthlingk (1815-1904)
Georg Curtius (1820-1885)
Max Müller (1823-1900)
August Schleicher (1823-1868)
William Dwight Whitney (1827-1894)
August Fick (1833-1916)
August Leskien (1840-1916)
Franz Kielhorn (1840-1908)
Wilhelm Scherer (1841-1886)
Berthold Delbrück (1842-1922)
Johannes Schmidt (1843-1901)
Ernst Windisch (1844-1918)
Karl Brugmann (1848-1919)
K. A. Verner (1846-1896)
Hermann Osthoff (1846-1909)
Jakob Wackernagel (1853-1938)
Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913)
Wilhelm August Streitberg (1864-1925)
Hermann Hirt (1865-1936)
Antoine Meillet (1866-1936)
Eduard Schwyzer (1874-1943)
Ferdinand Sommer (1875-1962)
Manu Leumann (1889-1977)
Jerzy Kuryłowicz (1895-1978)
Ernst Risch (1911-1988)
Oswald Szemerényi (1913-1996)
Karl Hoffmann (1915-1996)
Helmut Rix (1926-2004)
Tamaz Gamkrelidze (born 1929)
Jochem Schindler (1944-1994)
Journals
''Kuhn's Zeitschrift KZ since 1852, in 1988 renamed to Historische Sprachforschung HS
Indogermanische Forschungen IF since 1892
Glotta since 1909
Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris BSL
Die Sprache since 1949
Münchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft MSS 1952–
Journal of Indo-European studies JIES since 1973
Tocharian and Indo-European Studies since 1987
International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction IJDL Munich since 2004
Contemporary IE studies
A as punishment universities stand institutes devoted to IE studies (uncomplete):
Austria:
:Innsbruck [http://info.uibk.ac.at/c/c6/c604/], Salzburg [http://www.sbg.ac.at/spr/home.htm], Vienna [http://www.univie.ac.at/indogermanistik/]
Czech Republic: Prague [http://enlil.ff.cuni.cz/]
Denmark: Copenhagen [http://www.humanist.ku.dk/studier/beskrivelser/Indoeuropaeisk/default.htm]
Germany:
:Berlin [http://www.linguistik.hu-berlin.designato.de/indogermanistik/], Bonn [http://www.indogermanistik.uni-bonn.de/index.htm], Cologne [http://www.uni-koeln.de/phil-fak/ifl/], Dresden [http://www.tu-dresden.de/slk/tischler/home.htm], Erlangen [http://www.indogermanistik.phil.uni-erlangen.de/], Freiburg [http://www.indogermanistik.uni-freiburg.de/], Göttingen [http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~uhsw/], Hamburg [http://www.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/IPhASI/index.htm], Halle [http://www.indogerm.uni-halle.de/], Heidelberg [http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/institute/fak9/INDOG/], Jena [http://ulblin01.thulb.uni-jena.de/indogermanistik/], Marburg [http://www.uni-marburg.de/ios/sprachwissenschaft/welcome.html], Münster [http://www.uni-muenster.de/Indogermanistik/], München [http://www.indogermanistik.lmu.de/index.htm], Regensburg [http://www-zope.uni-regensburg.de:8080/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_IV/Indogermanistik/], Würzburg [http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/vergl-sprachwiss/idg.html]
Netherlands: Leiden [http://www.indo-europees.leidenuniv.nl/] [http://www.indo-european.org/]
Poland: Krakow [http://www.filg.uj.edu.pl/kjoie/]
Spain: Salamanca [http://clasicas.usal.es/]
Switzerland: Zurich [http://www.indoger.unizh.ch/]
UK: Oxford [http://www.ling-phil.ox.ac.uk/]
USA:
: Austin, Texas [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/lrc/ARD.html], Los Angeles [http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/pies/home.html]
Origin of the Term
A term Indo-European itself okay, todays inside English literature, was coined around 1813 by the British scholar Sir Thomas Young, although at that time, there wwhen there are no consensus as to the naming of the recently found language personal. Among a list suggested were:
indo-germanique (C. Malte-Brun, 1810)
Indoeuropean (Th. Young, 1813)
japetisk (Rasmus C. Rask, 1815)
indisch-teutsch (F. Schmitthenner, 1826)
sanskritisch (Wilhelm von Humboldt, 1827)
indokeltisch (The. F. Pott, 1840)
arioeuropeo (G. I personally. Ascoli, 1854)
Aryan (F. M. Müller, 1861)
aryaque (H. Chavée, 1867).
Inside English, Indo-German was utilized by J. C. Prichard within 1826 although he preferred Indo-European. Inside French, utilize of indo-européen was established by The. Pictet (1836). Within German literature, Indo-Europäisch was utilized by Franz Bopp since 1835, while a term Indo-Germanisch'' was introduced by Julius von Klapproth in 1823, intending to include a northernmost & the southernmost of the personal's branches, when it were as an abbreviation of the to the full list of required languages that got been commons inside earliest literature. Indo-Germanisch became constituted per works of August Friedrich Pott, who understood it to include a easternmost & a westmost branches, opening a doors to following vain discussions whether it should non become Indo-Celtic, or Tocharo-Celtic.
That numbers of of a list include a Germanic languages, this doesn't mean that a German language is somehow additional related the origins, these are, like, because Germanic branch wwhen considered the (northward-american) geographical extreme, as opposed to the (south-eastern) Indo-Aryan branch.
In todays world, Indo-European, Indo-Européen is swell established within English & French literature, when Indo-Germanisch remains todays within German literature, however alongside the growing total of utilizes of Indo-Europäisch.
|